News & Analysis

driven by the PitchBook Platform

Legal battles mount over scrapped deals as Forescout sues PE firm Advent

Coronavirus-related concerns have led to legal battles surrounding derailed deals, and Advent International’s halted acquisition of Forescout Technologies is the newest such case.

Forescout Technologies chairwoman Theresia Gouw asserted that all closing conditions for Advent International's deal to buy Forescout have been met.
​​​​​​(​​​​​Steve Jennings/Getty Images)

Fallout from the pandemic has created a new and growing trend: Legal battles over buyout deals that have been derailed by coronavirus-related concerns.

In the latest skirmish, cybersecurity company Forescout Technologies is suing Advent International to hold the private equity firm to its $1.9 billion agreement to take the cybersecurity company private. That comes after Boston-based Advent informed Forescout it wouldn’t move forward to complete the deal, which was announced in February, saying the tech company has been hit by “a material adverse effect” on its business.

At least a dozen other recent acquisitions have been canceled since the coronavirus outbreak went global, according to PitchBook data. In some cases when buyers have sought to unwind or abandon deals, they have pointed to material adverse change clauses, a legal concept to describe when an unforeseeable event—such as a pandemic—can upend a business being acquired. More coronavirus news: Continuing coverage from PitchBook.

Earlier this year some dealmakers started crafting language in deal terms that would actually preclude parties from treating the health crisis as such an event.

Last week the material adverse change clause was again in focus when a group of investors in American Express Global Business Travel sued The Carlyle Group and Singaporean sovereign wealth fund GIC. The pair, citing the pandemic as a material adverse change, reneged on a deal to buy a 20% stake in the business.

In Advent’s case, the buyout firm said it believes Forescout won’t be able to meet its financial obligations following the deal closing, adding that Forescout “has failed to operate in the ordinary course in several material respects” since the deal was signed. Companies use Forescout’s technology to manage security risks around their internet of things devices.

For its part, San Jose-based Forescout says it has met all closing conditions of the agreement, adding that the parties had agreed to omit the pandemic as grounds for a material adverse change.

Advent, which teamed up with Crosspoint Capital Partners for the buyout, had agreed to pay $33 a share for Forescout. The stock has dropped more than 30% since Advent’s ability to consummate the deal was thrown into question on Tuesday.

In announcing the company’s decision to file suit, Forescout chairwoman Theresia Gouw said in a statement that all closing conditions of the deal have been met.

“All companies have been challenged by this pandemic, and it is highly disappointing that Advent would attempt to exploit market volatility to renege on its contractual obligations,” Gouw said.

In response, Advent issued a statement that said the firm had been in talks with Forescout about an “alternative transaction” before the company resorted to a lawsuit. The firm added, “Advent is prepared to respond and will vigorously defend its position in court.”

  • andrew-woodman.jpg
    Written by Andrew Woodman
    Andrew Woodman is PitchBook’s London Bureau Chief and oversees news coverage of Europe and the Middle East. Andrew has been reporting on the private markets since 2012. He was previously an editor with Private Equity International and with the Asian Venture Capital Journal. A Japanese speaker, he spent the best part of a decade in Asia, living and working in both Japan and Hong Kong.
Join the more than 1.5 million industry professionals who get our daily newsletter!